A Remarkable Woman

Annie Londonderry 3Annie Londonderry was the first woman cyclist to circle the globe. Although she was a celebrity in her day she would now be completely forgotten if it was not for the extensive research of her descendant Peter Zheutlin and his book 'Around the World on Two Wheels'. Santa kindly brought me a copy and, although it can be hard to seperate truth from fantasy, it makes fascinating reading.
Annie's real name was Anna Kopchovsky and she was married with 3 young children. In 1895 she set off to cycle round the world apparently as part of a bet of $10,000 between two Boston sugar magnates. To make things even more difficult she had to set off without money, was not allowed to beg, and must earn $5000 during her journey. Earning the money was no problem for her as she gave talks to sell out audiences and sold signed copies of her photograph but as she only learnt to ride a bike two days before she set off she faced a steep learning curve!

Annie LondonderryLong journeys with outlandish conditions undertaken for a bet were popular entertainment at the time and were avidly reported in the newspapers. In Annie's case it is doubtful if this bet really existed or if it was invented by her to attract publicity and to earn fame and fortune. Annie was a skilful self publicist who never let the truth get in the way of a good story. Her change of name immediately attracted sponsorship from the Londonderry Spring Water company – the first instance of sponsorship for womens sport. When she left the Massachusetts State House on June 25 1894 she was riding a womans Columbia bicycle that weighed 42 pounds and dressed in long skirts. Roads were often little more than dirt tracks and as her bike was a fixed wheel there was no possibility of a little leisurely freewheeling. By the time she reached New York she had realised the unsuitability of her clothing and replaced her heavy skirt with a short skirt worn over bloomers. One of the things that astonished me when reading the book is the way the newspapers were far more concerned with what she wore than with what she did. Wearing bloomers was seen as more exceptional than cycling across the USA!

Annie's plan had been to cycle to San Fransisco and then continue by ship but by the time she reached Chicago three months later she had had enough. Her bike was too heavy and cumbersome and she had lost 20lbs in weight. The Sterling Cycle Company came to her rescue and supplied her with a lightweight (20lbs), diamond framed, specially painted Expert Model E Light Roadster. Its not clear why she then completely changed her plans and cycled back to New York to catch a steamer to France but riding a man's bike and wearing bloomers she certainly created quite a stir.

Annie Londonderry 2

If she caused a stir in the USA she caused a sensation in France and was feted everywhere she went on her ride from Le Havre to Marseille where she took another ship. At this point her claim to have cycled round the world becomes a little tenuous. She certainly visited Egypt, Columbo, Singapore, Saigon, Hong Kong, Shangai and Japan and did some cycling there but most of her travel was by ship. Nine months after leaving Boston she returned by ship to San Fransisco. The cyclometer on her bike read 7280 miles. She still had to cycle back to Chicago which brought her final cycling total to 9604 miles. She was a tremendous showman who knew how to exaggerate for maximum effect and, as previously remarked, never let the truth get in the way of a good story but this was none the less a tremendous achievement for a lone woman given the road conditions and prevailing social attitudes of the day.


7 comments on “A Remarkable Woman”

  1. Patrick wrote:

    Women can clearly be as crazy as men. What is even more interesting though, is how it was accepted (as it seems it was) that women could go and enjoy the same adventures as men in an age when they were otherwise so restricted. Not cyclists but Amy Johnson and Amelia Earhart were remarkable too. I love the term Aviatrix.

  2. Kern wrote:

    I like the "skilful self publicist who never let the truth get in the way of a good story" part. The entertainment industry hasn't changed a bit.

    Cycling 9604 miles is nothing to sneeze at even under today's cycling conditions. I bet she was sore by the time she finished!

  3. Hilary wrote:

    The thing that struck me most about this was the fact that a woman riding round the world was seen as less extraordinary than a woman wearing 'men's pants'! I wouldn't fancy riding to the end of the street dressed as she is in the first picture! She also had to keep very quiet about being married with children – leaving husband and kids would have been considered morally reprehensible. It was automatically assumed that she was single as no married woman could possibly consider doing such a thing.

  4. Mary wrote:

    WOW what a woman of her time! And indeed, the big padded cycle shorts were a long way from being invented I assume :)

    Loved that bike of hers too. Look at the seat post, designed to absorb the rough road ahead. I expect she has a Brooks beneath her. Clothing in those days must of been dreadful to do anything in at all. If they got wet, they stayed wet, and if they got hot, they stayed hot and wet and I should expect a bit smelly too.

    Its 100 years since Scott's great Southern Adventure, how anyone at all could do what the pioneers of yesterday did in the clothing they had to wear is anyones guess.

    I think due to research and development today, people are able to do more and more, I mean even Blue Peter are now going to the South Pole, and 16 year olds are able to sail around the world. Bravery and good clothing = greater possibilities for all.

  5. Hilary wrote:

    Mary wrote
    how anyone at all could do what the pioneers of yesterday did in the clothing they had to wear is anyones guess.

    I've just started reading a book called 'Invisible on Everest' about the evolution of outdoor gear that suggests that the clothes they wore ie wool, silk and gaberdine were actually pretty good. Also they suggests that the formal clothes they posed for the camera in weren't necessarily the ones they actually wore on the expeditions.

  6. Chris wrote:

    Also they suggest that the formal clothes they posed for the camera in weren't necessarily the ones they actually wore on the expeditions.

    Maybe we're just too cynical these days, but I reckon we're quick to question things we see in photographs these days. It never occurred to me that those old images may have been 'staged'. Makes sense now.

  7. Kern wrote:

    Re: formal clothes ... I may have to pack a shirt and tie for our next tour ...

Leave a comment

Add a Smiley Smiley »